The answer would be true if you need me to explain let me know
The correct answer is:
Virginia and Kentucky.
Explanation:
Virginia and Kentucky passed resolutions as a protest against the Alien and Sedition Acts approved by President John Adams. Both resolutions declared that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional and gave the federal government more power than it was stated in the Constitution, therefor the states had the power to declare those acts null. The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions were written anonymously, but later it was known that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Kentucky resolution even though he was Vice President of John Adams, and James Madison wrote the Virginia Resolution.
Answer:
B. Government regulations increase the cost of making the product. Explanation:
B. is the only correct answer becuase if the governemnt increased the cost of making the product with government regulations, then buying the supplies to make the product would go up making the supply of the product go down.
A. could not be a possiblity becuase if a business were to expect the product to start selling at a higher rate would cuase the company to increase in product supplt.
C. Is not a possiblity becuase If more workers were to reciver the education needed to create the product then they would be more knowledgeable on how to construct the item, causing them to make more which makes the product supply go up.
D. could not be a possibility becuase new technology causes the product to be made more quickly which increases product supply.
The answer is D, religion was very important to them.
Answer:
a) To ensure freedom from control by elected officials
Explanation:
Constitutionally (Article III), federal judges are appointed for life. The Constitution gives federal judges employment security so they may resolve cases without public or political pressure. Even if they make unfavorable judgments, federal judges can only be impeached.
They are sheltered from the political process yet being young and inexperienced encourages judges to remain on the bench long after good reason would have retired them. According to Eastman and UT professor Stephen Vladeck, term restrictions might diminish independence and let money influence the system. If judges were obliged to retire at 60, some industry or interest may have employed them later.