1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
2 years ago
10

Which of the following describes a key difference between the League of Nations and the United Nations?

History
2 answers:
ad-work [718]2 years ago
5 0
D should be the correct answer
creativ13 [48]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D. The league of nations was disbanded before the world war two, while the United Nations represented the interests of Asian Countries is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The league of Nations and United nations are two major organisations of the world. League of nation came into being at the end of world war in 1919 and the United nations came into existence at the end of world war two. There were only 63 members in League of nations while UN has 192 members. <em>The</em> <em>League of nation was unsuccessful in preventing the war and is considered  to be a failure While the United Nations have prevented the war and also works as a peacekeeping agency in twenty first century </em>. United states was not the part of league of nations which made the league of nations less powerful.

You might be interested in
During the English Commonwealth period, the Levellers demanded that… all Christians should have religious freedom. the Anglican
IRISSAK [1]
During the English Commonwealth period, the Levellers demanded that all citizens should have a voice in the government.
3 0
3 years ago
Where did most immigrants come from during the second wave of immigrants to the United States?
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Latin America and Asia

so the Last choice.

Please give me brainliest!! you'll get 25% of the points you give as well!!

3 0
1 year ago
How did the Dred Scott decision increase tensions between North and South?
dem82 [27]
<span>Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom. His owner brought him to a free state. Therefore Dred Scott was a on free land making him free. Chief Justice, Roger B. Taney ruled against Dred Scott saying that he was property and not a citizen. The South now felt that they could now bring their slaves to any free soil. The North was man and said that it was a Southern conspiracy. I hope this answers your question!</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Please help me !!! hahsosbsvskdbdbdndo
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Winds blowing across the ocean surface cause friction which results in
I am Lyosha [343]
Which results in waves in the ocean.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were some options for slaves in the Abbasid caliphate?
    10·1 answer
  • Why is history open to ongoing and changing interpretations
    12·1 answer
  • What effect did the Black Death have on the Church?
    5·2 answers
  • In what way were civil liberties in the United States affected by the First World War?
    10·1 answer
  • What factors could have caused tut to fall from his chariot
    7·1 answer
  • What contributions did these two pharaohs make in the categories listed in the chart?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Americans define themselves coming out of the American Revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • Who published How the Other Half Lives, which influenced politicians in New York and nationwide to clean up the evils of tenemen
    9·1 answer
  • Please HELP!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Have U.S leaders learned from the Spanish-American war or are they making the same mistakes as before? Use details to back up yo
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!