First off, this isn't really a yes or no question, this is an opinion.
My opinion is that photos that have been altered in any way should be marked. These days you never know what a person will do to say, get a job, advance a political agenda, or ruin the reputation of another person. The public has the right to the truth. Therefore, altered pictures should be marked or labeled in a way that differentiates them from others.
The theater of cruelty was founded by French playwright, Henry Becque. Antonin Artaud, originally a member of the surrealist movement, is a main contributor to this genre and began to write his own theatrical theories.
<span>Turkey's government converted Hagia Sophia into a museum in 1934. </span>It was originally built as a Christian church under the reign of Justinian. After the Turks captured Constantinople the Hagia Sophia was converted into a mosque.
Answer:
pls mark me as the brainliest
Explanation:
The Bird in Space by Constantin Brancusi represents a bird without its wings, feathers and the head and tail were reduced to an oval shape, the body was also elongated. This is to represent simplicity and what something would look like if stripped from everything and reduced to the simplest representation.
The Wild Turkey by James Audubon was made to make people inquire about the turkey's importance, its migration patterns, why it walks more than it flies considering that it is a bird.
