Answer:
The correct option is D. $7,124
Explanation:
To compute the catering supplies amount, the following items need to be considered. along with this, the computation is also shown:
= Catering supplies + Job cost + meal cost
where,
Catering supplies are $530 per month
Job cost = Per job cost × expected number of jobs
= $114 × 25 jobs
= $2,850
Meal cost = Per meal cost × expected number of meals
= $16 × 234 meals
= $3,744
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the answer would be equal to
= $530 + $2,850 + $3,744
= $7,124
The actual activity is not consider. Thus, it is ignored.
Hence, The catering supplies in the flexible budget for October would be closest to $7,124
Therefore, the correct option is D. $7,124
Yes, Bob does retain interest in this transaction as he registered under safeguard terms. because the protection clause suggest:-
A former agent is additionally obligated to the buyer registered under the protection provision in the listing agreement if the seller is shown the property by an agent within the listing term as the listing expires. The seller will still be required to pay the agent's fee if a protected buyer tries to make a direct purchase from them while the protection period is still in effect.
<h3><u>What is the purpose of a protection clause?</u></h3>
- A safety protection provision is intended to guarantee that a broker gets paid fairly for their services and to prohibit buyers' and sellers' collusion.
- A contingency known as a broker protection clause, sometimes known as a safety clause or extension clause, is present in listing agent contracts. This provision states that in some circumstances, even if the house sells after their listing has expired, the seller will pay the listing agent commission fees.
To know more about protection clause, check the given links.
brainly.com/question/25079139
brainly.com/question/2252772
#SPJ4
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
The answer to the blank space is etiquette and manners.
When a salesperson receives training to enhance their etiquette and manners, it would help with their self-confidence when meeting potential clients or customers. It would also help them in establishing a good relationship with these individuals, since people are more receptive to people with good manners.
Answer:
This is an example of expertise
Explanation:
Expertise can be seen with the wide range of knowlege. Expertise can be seen in how the knowlege is applied as well.
