Answer:
it effected the geographical knowledge of the time, also the mapping of the east coast of Australia which paved the way for British settlement
Explanation:
Answer:
a conflict between the ideas of federalism and sectionalism
Explanation:
Answer:
First Paragraph:
The events leading to the Boston Massacre weren’t amazing. First, there was the Stamp Act Congress in 1767. These were designed to raise money. The Stamp Act Congress were the original people to let colonies protest the British law. However, the document says that this couldn’t pass because this wasn’t represented by British government. Next, there was the Townshend Act in 1767. This was also designed to raise money. This was put on things like glass, lead, paint, and tea. This led to the Boston Tea Party in 1773. Some patriots decided to dress up as Natives and protest this act and destroy ships full of tea and throw it overboard. They were punished by the government putting out another act. In 1774, The First Continental Congress met up and wrote to the king how angry they were about the tea.
Second Paragraph:
On the night of March 5th, 1770, British soldiers in the Massachusetts bay started firing on a large group of colonists. The soldiers stood in front of the Customs House. The soldiers stood there to stop were there to stop validation up against the Townshend Acts. However, they failed making everyone extremely angry. I don’t believe they were accountable for the murder. They were just acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
Answer:
Constitutional
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was widely talked about the case in the United States. It occurred in the year 1896.
in the ruling, the United States of America's Supreme Court ruled in favor and upheld the CONSTITUTIONALITY of Louisiana state law that supports equal but separate settlements for the white and colored races.
Hence, during Plessy V. Ferguson. The supreme court ruled that the doctrine of separate but equal was CONSTITUTIONAL
