Answer:
translational research
Explanation:
According to my research on the different types of research approaches, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Dr. Borden is using a translational research method. This method that is specifically designed in order to improve specific health outcomes by applying knowledge from the fields of biology and clinical trial techniques to address the medical needs that are present. Which in this situation the medical need is weight gain for premature babies who are in intensive care.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
<em>true </em><em>syllogism</em><em> </em><em>does </em><em>have </em><em>three </em><em>prepositions.</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
This is true because Christopher Columbus had to make four trips across the Atlantic Ocean from Spain. These trips took place in 1492, 1493, 1498 and 1502. he hoped to find a direct water route west from Europe to Asia, he never did. Instead he found the Americas where millions of people had already lived. Columbus finding the Americas was the start of many centuries of exploration and colonization of North and South America.
The complete question is -
Assume that you and 10 of your friends are stuck on a deserted island. No one is coming to get you. So, you have no option other than to adjust to this new life. Answer these questions about what you might do in this situation. Part A There are fruit trees on the island. Everyone spends an equal number of hours collecting fruit. How do you decide how much fruit each person gets?
Answer:
The correct answer is - Everyone gets only the fruit he or she personally collected.
Explanation:
In this setting, there are 11 people stuck on an island, each and everyone is equally contributed the same number of hours in collecting fruits. However, each person spends the same time but can be collect equal, less or more fruits. Thus, the fruits should be distributed how much each work for collecting fruits.
Thus, The correct answer is - Everyone gets only the fruit he or she personally collected.
