Correct answer: Court cases challenged the legality of discrimination.
I'll mention key court cases after debunking the other answers in the list. Truman's desegregation of the armed forces happened already in 1948, and impacted only those in the armed forces, rather than all African Americans. The suburbs were NOT welcoming toward African Americans, and they remained in living mostly in urban centers.
As to key court cases of the 1950s regarding discrimination:
1950: Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. In these cases, the Supreme Court said segregation of African American students in law and graduate schools was unconstitutional. This was the start of challenging "separate-but-equal" policies.
1954: Brown v. Board of Education. Firm decision that "separate but equal" policies were unconstitutional across the education system. Chief Justice Earl Warren, speaking for the unanimous opinion of the Court, said: “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
1955: Brown v. Board II. The Supreme Court directed that school systems must abolish segregation “with all deliberate speed.”
1956: The Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling that the segregation of the Montgomery, Alabama, bus system was illegal. This was in reference to the bus boycott that had begun with the protest by Rosa Parks.
1958: Cooper v. Aaron. The Supreme Court upheld the US Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) decision that resistance by local officials and threats of violence in the community did not justify delaying desegregation. This followed in the wake of the Little Rock Nine (a group of black students) seeking enrollment in LIttle Rock Central High School.
<span>Answer:
Amid the twelfth and thirteenth hundreds of years, colleges emerged in the real European urban communities. These colleges took care of the demand for training in the seven human sciences—language structure, talk, rationale, cosmology, geometry, number-crunching, and music—instruction that turned into a critical way to professional success. Colleges gaining practical experience in the higher orders—law at Bologna, pharmaceutical at Salerno, and religious philosophy and theory at Paris—moved toward becoming places for scholarly civil argument. The twelfth century philosophical school known as Scholasticism grew new frameworks of rationale in light of Europeans' rediscovery of Aristotle from Islamic and Jewish sources. Researchers faced off regarding how people can know truth—regardless of whether learning of truth happens through confidence, through human reason and examination, or through some mix of the two means. Albeit none of these researchers denied Christian truth as it was uncovered in the Bible, a few, for example, Anselm of Canterbury, set confidence before reason. Others, for example, Peter Abelard, put reason first. The colossal thirteenth century Dominican savant Thomas Aquinas delivered a splendid union of confidence and reason, while a gathering of rationalists called nominalists addressed whether human dialect could precisely depict reality. These investigation into the idea of information added to logical request, clear in the test hypotheses of English researcher and thinker Roger Bacon (1214?- 1294).
In the mean time, many individuals looked for a more otherworldly, all encompassing knowledge of the world than what was offered through the insightfulness or through standard church customs. Visionaries and reformers made new requests, for example, the Cistercians, Franciscans, and Dominicans. Holy person Francis of Assisi rejected the urban realism of his folks and nearby church. He built up a vagabond, or hobo, way of life for the supporters of his congregation endorsed arrange—Franciscan monks for men and the Poor Clares for ladies. Numerous religious scholars in the 1200s were affected by the before reasoning of Christian Neoplatonism, a union of Plato's standards and Christian magic. Under that impact, they dismissed the Aristotelian concentrate on supporting religion and trusted God's perfect disclosure could best be comprehended through understanding. The Cistercian Bernard of Clairvaux, who passed on in 1153, expected that Abelard's academic rationale would stifle genuine profound comprehension. Afterward, Bonaventure, a Franciscan who lived from 1221 to 1274, built up a magical reasoning managing Christians toward consideration of the perfect domain of God.
Well known religion additionally mirrored this social and religious mature. A great many people in medieval Europe were Christian by submersion during childbirth and took an interest in chapel ceremonies for the duration of their lives. They did retribution for sins, went to Mass, and went on journeys to blessed locales containing relics of holy people. In the urban communities, laypeople started looking for a more extraordinary religious experience to offset the realism of their urban lives. Many were drawn into new religious developments, not which were all affirmed by the congregation. This prompted strife between chapel instructed universal lessons and practices and apostasy, convictions and practices that were denounced as false by the congregation and considered a risk to Christendom. Like the religious requests, sins, for example, the Cathars (otherwise called the Albigensians), the Waldensians, and the Spiritual Franciscans accentuated otherworldly life; be that as it may, they likewise condemned the congregation's realism and tested its power. For example, the Cathars dismissed the body as abhorrent and saw no requirement for clerics. Church pioneers censured them as apostates, while mainstream rulers, keen on stifling neighborhood uprisings against their power, completed a military campaign to crush their fortifications in southern France. The congregation, whose principle and request were debilitated by these gatherings, selected evangelists, for example, the Dominicans to educate rectify regulation and furthermore appointed inquisitors to recognize blasphemers and suggest them for discipline.</span>
I think it was because there were too many immigrants coming in and taking our jobs, and American decided figure out what was an actual American, (so like the first settlers), and the immigrants weren't
"American" I actually think they limited china on how many people could come into the US and then after so many people came they cut them off, and then the Chinese who wanted to come to America would have to wait until next year. But then they considered that un American I guess unconstitonal is the word and then undid that law. I hope this helps.
