Answer:
The film is a metaphor for "the rat race." Get it? That's why the rat imagery appears throughout the film. All over the film. The film is a rant against the rat race. The lesson, therefore, is the more obvious "hey, we need to stop and 'smell the roses.'" I found the film enjoyable, and I accepted the recurring scenes as they were intended: without them, you'd have no film. So I simply didn't let the repetition get to me. I looked for inconsistencies in the images as I watched them again and again; that is, I looked for changes during the recurring events. (No, I didn't see any.) But, again, the rat race metaphor is really very clever, and I didn't understand the rat metaphor (assuming I'm correct) until the film started its second cycle. I did not find the "product placements" to be intrusive -- which I'm sure is what the film makers intended.
Explanation:
C. Because they don’t care about people’s health and just want to make money
In <em>The Case of the Defaced Painting</em>, we immediately encounter details that can help us solve the mystery. Part 1 of the story contains several clues. We learn that there is paint on the floor and on the chair that is close to the painting. We also learn that Mrs. Williams seems to be angry about the fact that her husband cares about the paintings so much. Finally, we also learn that Mrs. William is not wearing her wedding ring.
Lemme seeee hmmm I’m try and help
