1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
3 years ago
6

What confirmed Grover’s hunch that there was danger?

English
1 answer:
SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. He realized that the cement statue used to be his uncle.

Explanation:

When "Aunty Em" invited Grover, Annabeth, and Percy in, Grover had a feeling that something was wrong. It wasn't until they passed by stone statues that he realized that something was wrong, because he thought he saw his uncle Ferdinand among them.

You might be interested in
Help
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

I think this is suggesting that the girls don't want to play with the boys so they leave.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10.Which sentence has a pronoun with an unclear, missing, or confusing antecedent?
Alex Ar [27]
A is the correct answer.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect has ethnic studies had on you?
bija089 [108]

Answer:

Different ethnic studies...

Explanation:

Well, although I haven't really studied this topic in school, the topic "ethnic studies" has given me more diverse and unbiased opinions on many things. Such as stereotypes, how were they made, why and how do they affect that group of people. This field is mainly based on what educational standpoint everyone is at. People who are less educated will tend to rely on media and have a very biased perspective.  

3 0
3 years ago
Which statements represent valid reasoning and which statements represent invalid reasoning?
8090 [49]

The first statement is Invalid Reasoning. Though a dog run would be a kind action towards dogs, it is not truly a valid point in justifying the construction of a dog run. It is not enough of a reason.

The second statement is also Invalid reasoning. The information is not relevant to the argument of building or not a dog run.

The third statement is Valid Reasoning. It states clearly an argument in favour of building a dog run.

The fourth statement is also Valid Reasoning. It explains a reason why the dog run is not really a priority, and would benefit only few citizens. It is a valid argument against the dog run

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is not apart of cubing
Ivanshal [37]
Identifying an audience for the product
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A presentation is called __?__ if it uses more than one kind of medium.
    5·1 answer
  • Romance, who loves to nod and sing, With drowsy head and folded wing, Among the green leaves as they shake Far down within some
    14·2 answers
  • The road between West Egg and East egg is
    8·1 answer
  • What is the falling action in a story
    5·1 answer
  • Whose perspective does this story show?
    13·1 answer
  • I need dome writing ideas?? asap!!
    13·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the human inspector in the jungle?
    15·1 answer
  • July 30th 2020 morning around 10AM I was at suddenly sharp pain start in me heart I fell on the floor my coworkers called the am
    8·2 answers
  • B I was so relieved to arrive home that I felt as if
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement would best connect the graphic to the blogger’s viewpoint that bullying is an issue in the community?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!