1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babymother [125]
3 years ago
13

The No Child Left Behind Act was a grant program enacted in 2002 that directed testing elementary and secondary students in math

and reading proficiency. This act required states to create, fund, and implement programs that would help all students become proficient in these areas by 2014. After reading the scenario, respond to A, B, and C below:
a. Describe a power Congress could use to address the information outlined in the scenario.

b. In the context of the scenario, explain how the power described in Part A can be affected by perspectives on one of the foundational principles of U.S. government.

c. In the context of the scenario, explain how the foundational principle in Part B affects the structure and function of the federal government.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ber [7]3 years ago
4 0
The answer will be c have a great day:)
You might be interested in
The Texas Constitution makes the governor a relatively weak executive; however, he maximizes influences with his tenure in offic
avanturin [10]

The correct answer is all of these choices are true.

  • The Texas Constitution contains a system of checks and balances to further balance authority.
  • Each branch of this system is capable of controlling or constraining the other two.
  • These controls aid in preventing one branch of the government from dominating others.
  • These controls and counter controls are modeled after those in the U.S. Constitution.
  • A line-item veto is available to the governor of Texas but not to the president.

Why is the Texas governor considered weak ?

  • Since his authority is thus constrained, the Texas governor is viewed as being weak.
  • The Texas governor essentially has the same amount of authority as the lieutenant governor and can simply veto measures.
  • Boards of bureaucracy can be appointed by the governor to increase the authority of his position.

Learn more about The Texas Constitution brainly.com/question/14925195

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Wearing your favorite team’s t-shirt the day after they win a big game is an example of ___________, whereas removing the pro-ca
Llana [10]

Answer:

Basking in reflected glory; cutting off reflected failure

Explanation:

Basking in reflected glory which is abbreviated as BIRGing is the self-serving cognition where by the individual associates with the known others which are successful such that success of the winner success becomes the individual's own achievement.  

<u>Thus, wearing the favorite team t shirt is an example of Basking in reflected glory. </u>

Cutting off reflected failure which is abbreviated as CORFing is the idea which the people tend to disassociate from the lower-status individuals because the  people don't want their reputations to be affected by failed people.

<u>Thus, removing the sticker is an example of cutting off reflected failure.</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Which ruler increased hispowers as an absolute ruler in order to westernize russia
Ivanshal [37]

Peter the Great (l) aka Peter Alexeyevich

4 0
3 years ago
Derrick accepted a job in another state. His wife, who is not employed outside the home, is not happy about moving but feels she
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

This is an example of A. Fate control

Explanation:

Fate control refers to an individual having complete control <em>over another </em>individual's actions or about the general outcome of his/her life. The person whose actions are being controlled has no say in this whatsoever.

In this case, Derrick's wife works from home and we would say she depends on him. She feels that she <em>does not have a choice over the matter,</em> thus this example is about fate control.

3 0
3 years ago
In the United States, it is possible for someone to give a gift of up to how much money per year to another person without that
arsen [322]

The correct answer is $14.000

Explanation: In 2016 and 2017, a taxpayer could give up to $14,000 per person per year without being taxed on the gift.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how separation of powers and checks and balances work together. use examples.
    12·1 answer
  • The burning of fossil fuels allows sunlight to enter earths atmosphere freely but inhibits the release of heat. this is referred
    12·2 answers
  • Which war proved to be highly unpopular among citizens of the United States, leading to widespread protests?
    15·1 answer
  • The main reason that water salinity is such a problem for countries in the Middle East is that it __________. A. Destroys dams i
    15·2 answers
  • What was the most important effect of Ramses II’s long reign?
    7·2 answers
  • PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS
    9·1 answer
  • 1. State two ways in which a family begins
    14·1 answer
  • Arabic traders crosses the desert in large called what?
    11·2 answers
  • Asia: Tang, Song, Mongols, and Ming Intellect ( how did they get smart or something )
    14·1 answer
  • A special election the legislative branch
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!