1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
5

Do you think having only two parties in power in the US is good or bad for our country? Why?​

History
1 answer:
Mandarinka [93]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>

Here is another argument

While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>    

Explanation:

It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.  

You might be interested in
Which country were they first planted at in the new world?
k0ka [10]
Portugal with arrival of Columbus in 1492
5 0
3 years ago
Why was learning important to the abbasiads
mina [271]

Answer: Why is Abbasid important?

The Abbasids, who ruled from Baghdad, had an unbroken line of caliphs for over three centuries, consolidating Islamic rule and cultivating great intellectual and cultural developments in the Middle East in the Golden Age of Islam.

Explanation: give me brainly a thanks and a vote bye have a good day

3 0
3 years ago
Why is this photograph a primary source?
Klio2033 [76]
By definition a primary source is some king of source where the person that recorded it was actually there for the event, so the closest answer would be it describes an event from a historical perspective
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What conclusion does this image best support?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

the answer is "A. France formed an official alliance with America during the war.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened when John White arranged for a peace conference with the area’s American Indians? A misunderstanding led to confli
Natalija [7]

<u>The answer is that a peace treaty was signed, but the settlers did not follow it.</u>

The British Government came to the conclusion that settlers and Indians should remain separate. On October 7, 1763, the Crown drafted the Royal Decree of 1763, through which he wanted to reorganize the North American territories  

The officers drew a line of separation between the British colonies and the lands of the natives west of the Appalachian Mountains, creating an immense Indian Reservation that ranged from the Appalachians to the Mississippi River and from Florida to Newfoundland. By prohibiting settlers from entering Indian lands, the British government hoped to avoid new events such as the Pontiac Rebellion.  

The effects of the Pontiac war were noted for a long time. Because the Decree recognized some indigenous rights over the lands they occupied, it became known as the Indian Bill of Rights.

<em>However, the Royal Decree of 1763 did not prevent the British from attempting to expand westward, so the Indians were forced to form new resistance movements. </em>The first began in 1767 after a meeting organized by the Shawnee.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was one provision of the dons act of 1887?
    9·1 answer
  • Pre-Columbia art is art that was produced before whose arrival in the Americas
    12·1 answer
  • Industrial workers often labored:
    14·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each statement.
    14·1 answer
  • Which was an environmental cost of the Columbian Exchange?
    7·1 answer
  • which nation emerged from world war 1 as a strengthened world power A. The soviet union B. Germany C. France D. The United State
    6·1 answer
  • The first step in the sewage-treatment process is
    10·1 answer
  • What was the strategy behind the development of the hunley machine
    6·1 answer
  • Some reasons that a country<br> might go to war with another<br> country?
    6·1 answer
  • Choose a composer.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!