Answer:
A. The demand rises while the supply falls.
Explanation:
When demand rises people want more of a product, but if the amount of that product (supply) is low it's more difficult to acquire said product, making it more expensive.
England was only influential in theory because they practiced salutary neglect which means that they didn't bother the colonists as long as the colonies belonged to them and paid taxes. The types of governments depended on who the colony belonged to. Royal colonies listened to the parliament but Charter colonies often did what they wanted. England was influential only up until the point that people were willing to accept.
The answer to this question is B
Answer:
An Agreement Built on Quicksand
Explanation:
In his congressional address, he outlined a vision for a just and peaceful world including freedom of the seas, and an international agreement to avoid arms races while positioning the United States to act as a mediating force when calling for peace without victory.
Answer:
According to the article "Excerpt from civil Disobedience" we can say that it is fair that we do not get involved in problems and disadvantages that are happening in the world, but for that we need to stop exploring each other, so that those who are stuck in these problems can fight your own fight.
Explanation:
"Civil Disobedience" is the most famous work by Henry David Thoreau, where he opposes the practice of paying taxes to governments. In "Excerpt from civil Disobedience" we can see that Thoreau says that no man has a responsibility to solve the problems that exist in the world. This reinforces the idea that nobody has a duty to pay taxes, because the government does not have this responsibility and if it does not fulfill it.
However, Thoreau says that these problems exist and that no one can be prevented from solving them. However, it is necessary that people who are involved in the problem are not exploited or prevented from fighting to solve these problems. We can see elements that serve as a basis for this argument, in our personal life, since we could overcome many of our problems if the State gave us full freedom to do so, instead of being obliged to finance problems of which we are not part.
