<span>Great Britain and France, two European powers with a vested interest in following what occurred during the American Civil War. Britain and France each watched, followed, and responded to the events of the Civil War in a manner that best served their own interests. Let's learn more about this fascinating international story.
France and the Civil War
Between these two countries, France played a much smaller role in the American Civil War. France maintained that it was officially neutral during the conflict, yet parts of the country sympathized with the Confederacy, mostly because of the need for Southern cotton. The Union blockade restricted the flow of Southern cotton, forcing some French textile manufacturers to lay off workers, hurting their business severely.
Furthermore, French Emperor Napoleon III had a desire to spread his rule into parts of Mexico, something which the Confederacy would have been able to assist with. Thus, Napoleon III had something to gain from a Confederate victory in the war. Others in France sympathized with the Union, primarily, because of their hatred of slavery in the American South.
The Confederacy did send diplomats to France to encourage assistance in the South's cause. Men such as John Slidell, a leading Confederate diplomat to France, attempted to convince France to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation as well as to arrange for loans and assistance for the Confederate cause. While France never officially recognized the Confederacy, some French capitalists did assist the South by providing loans and financial assistance.
Britain and the Civil War
While France never truly had an impact in the Civil War, Great Britain played a larger role in the conflict. Like France, Britain remained officially neutral throughout the war, but that did not stop the country from finding ways to make its presence known.
Many in the government of Great Britain, such as Prime Minister Viscount Palmerston, the head of the British government during the Civil War, leaned toward recognizing the Confederacy despite Britain's stated neutrality. Both sides still tried to sway Palmerston and his government. The Union government sent leading ambassador and diplomat Charles Francis Adams Sr. to Britain to persuade the country to maintain its neutrality, while the South sent several different diplomats. The most prominent Confederate diplomat sent to Britain was James Mason, who worked hard to convince the British to recognize the Confederacy. In September 1862, Palmerston and his administration were on the verge of recognizing the Confederacy, but the Union victory at Antietam convinced them otherwise. Through the rest of the war, Britain would remain neutral.</span>
Answer: Poor living conditions, the emergence of capitalism, the pursuit of establishing new political systems.
Explanation:
The French Revolution is the most radical in history. It has caused "tectonic disturbances" worldwide. The causes of the French Revolution are multiple. First of all, it is a consequence of outdated feudal forms of government and relationships dating back to the Middle Ages. In such circumstances, the population lived extremely poorly. The quest for the quality of life of the common man in French change has encouraged millions of people to stand up against the tyranny and arbitrariness of governing structures.
The Industrial Revolution began in English. In this country, more is being invested in technological innovation than in other parts of the world. Investing and researching in this field is an effort to improve the quality of life in every segment. Thus, technological innovations in the industry have contributed to the industrial revolution.
The revolution in Russia was the result of the weak rule of the Romanov monarch. The country was in deep economic and political depth. Russia was not industrially developed, and it was necessary to reach the level of economic development that was evident in many European countries. The absolutist aspirations and arbitrariness of the Romanov rulers also encouraged the people and other political factions in the country to revolutionize.
The pros of the Nile River are: it provided water for crops, gave a water source, and provided a food source. The cons were: over flooding, pollution, and caused destruction to homes and farm lands.
