Answer:
Some benefits that colonial rule brought to Southeast Asia were that initiated a modern economic system, there were roads, highways, and railroads built, and the development of an export market created a entrepreneurial class of people in rural areas. Even though most of the profits went back to the colonial mother country, some growers of rubber, palm oil, coffee, tea, and spices made profits. I think the disadvantages outweighed the advantages because they still didn't have a lot of freedom and couldn't freely trade how they wanted to.
<span>Fugitive Slave Act
The Act standout amongst the most questionable components of the 1850 bargain and uplifted Northern feelings of trepidation of a "slave control scheme". It required that all got away slaves were, upon catch, to be sent back to their lords and that authorities and residents of free states needed to coordinate in this law. End to slavery campaigners nicknamed it the bloodhound law because those were the kind of animals that were utilised to find runaway slaves</span>
The answer is B Thomas Hobbes
He believed that an absolute monarchy was best.
Here are two truths about the Kellogg-Briand Pact.
1. It wanted to outlaw war, so that nothing like The Great War would ever happen again.
2. It failed to have any real impact in keeping nations from pursuing war, and we now call "The Great War" World War I, because it was followed by World War II.
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Aristide Briand and US Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg were key proponents of the plan, which was signed by various dignitaries at the White House in 1928. The pact stated that the signing nations were "persuaded that the time has come when a frank renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy should be made," and so the signers of the treaty declared their opposition to war. By their example they hoped to encourage other nations of the world to join them in the same commitment.
The pact had little effect.
