Add all of the hours together than divide by 5 should get 40
Answer:
7
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The <u>actual values</u> are shown on the given graph as <u>blue points</u>.
The <u>line of regression</u> is shown on the given graph as the <u>red line</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2000 the actual rainfall was 43 cm, shown by point (2000, 43). It appears that the regression line is at y = 50 when x is the year 2000.
⇒ Difference = 50 - 43 = 7 cm
<u>In 2000, the actual rainfall was </u><u>7</u><u> centimeters below what the model predicts</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2003 the actual rainfall was 44 cm, shown by point (2003, 40). It appears that the regression line is at y = 40 when x is the year 2003.
⇒ Difference = 44 - 40 = 4 cm
<u>In 2003, the actual rainfall was </u><u>4</u><u> centimeters above what the model predicts.</u>
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Hihi. So, this is a nice application of interest rates as well as properties of exponentials/logarithms. As you know, the basic equation for interest rates is A= Pe^(rt) where A is your final amount, P is your initial, r is your rate of interest, and t is the time the money was accumulating interest. After cleaning up, you get in a situation due to you having e still lying around. Luckily, if you take the natural log of e, all you have left behind is the previous exponent. Thus, you can take the natural log of both sides, divide by 4, and then simplify to see that your final interest rate is ~6%
<span>B. 1 + 1 = 2
C. 2 + 0 = 2</span>