<span>Unfortunately, you did not support your question with the following options, so it is getting difficult to satisfy your task. But I have one statement that can help you and redirect on the right ideas : the dominant group feels superior to the minority, its members' self-concepts are strengthened.
I hope that you will find this information useful.
</span>
Answer:
I was playing catch with my two dogs, Peanut and Butter, because he loves to play so much.
Explanation:
This sentence because if you are referring to two objects you don't use or need a singular pronoun, so instead of he the correct use would be they.
Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
Answer:
Natural resources tend to heavily correlated with the history technological development and conflicts in the community.
Explanation:
Natural resources is necessary for a people to develop their infrastructures and generate wealth. The more wealth a community able to accumulate, the more likely that community will invest in the development of science /technology that might help them in the future.
But, it's also provide one downside. Existence of natural reserouces tend to attract the attention of other communities who wanted to take ownerships over that resources. As a result, it has the likelihood of causing conflict throughout the communities' history.