<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Answer:
Explanation:
his architectural endeavors, most notable the Ramesseum and the temples of Abu Simbel. Ramses II's interest in architecture resulted in the erection of more monuments than any of the other ancient Egyptian pharaohs.
Answer:
Explanation:
Speaking vocabulary consists of the words we use when we speak
Answer:
macbeth has a lot of foreshadowing, symbolism and irony.
Explanation:
the play opens with thunder and lightning as the 3 witches appear, this foreshadows the rest of the play as witches are seen as evil and bad, therefore foreshadowing the evil and bad events that follow.
Answer:
what do you mean by that?????????
Explanation:
???????????????????????????????????
