Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
Answer:
Weight of apples = 2.1 kg
Explanation:
Total kilograms of pears and apples = 8.4kg
Pears = 3/4 of the total weight
= 3/4 × 8.4
= (3*8.4) / 4
= 25.2 / 4
= 6.3 kg
Weight of pears = 6.3kg
Let Weight of apples = x
Total weight = Weight of pears + Weight of apples
8.4 = 6.3 + x
x = 8.4 - 6.3
x = 2.1 kg
Weight of apples = 2.1 kg
The answer is: A. to point out details the character would not notice.
The first-person point of view is a literary device that allows readers to get to know that character's thoughts, feelings and motives. Because the narrator refers to himself with words like <em>I, me, my </em>and <em>mine</em>, the story is seen through his or her eyes. As a consequence, it is not impartial and it may suggest features which are unknown or unnoticeable to the narrator. For example, they might not realize they have a psychological condition.