Answer:
Common law
Religious law
Civil law
Bureaucratic law
Explanation:
Common law : Simply defined as laws established on the basis of precedents ( decisions from previous court proceedings on related cases). Common laws are referenced when existing laws or statutes aren't enough to determine the outcome of a proceeding.
Civil law: Refers to a comprehensive system of codified rules and principles which adopted as the primary source of law. It is accessible to both citizen and judiciary. Jurist may also make adjustments based on circumstances and social changes.
Religious law : These are laws based on the doctrines of a particular religious institution such as hindu law, islamic sharia which emanates from the sacred text of different religious affiliation.
Bureaucratic law : These are laws passed or made on the principle of rank and hierarchy. They are made by bureaucrats (top level individuals) with or without regard to formal laws. Bureaucratic laws are predominant in communist Communities who have no regards for democracy or formal laws.
Answer:
thoughtful planning
Explanation:
Marketing is the activity responsible for mapping consumer needs so that companies produce goods and services aimed at the target audience. Thus, companies tend to increase their sales and maximize revenue. Good marketing requires careful planning, ranging from identifying the group of potential consumers, through the design of the produce, to developing advertising that can attract those consumers.
Answer:
to prevent one branch from gaining too much power over the others.
Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
because the two biggest parties in the U.S are the Republicans and the Democrats.
