1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_tiger [21]
3 years ago
15

These words from Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison are inscribed on the U.S. Supreme

Court building. How does this statement relate to the function of the judicial branch and its place within our three-branch system of government? Why do you think this idea was important enough to have it displayed at the Supreme Court? If we did not have an independent, impartial judicial branch, who might be responsible for saying what the law is, and why might that be problematic?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
4 0

Answer and Explanation:

1. The statement this question refers to is "Equal Justice Under Law." This declaration shows that the judiciary is completely in accordance with the laws in force in the country and does not take decisions that could violate those laws, determining that the laws are the center of the national organization and that which must never be disobeyed. In this case, we can see that the role of the judiciary within the three-branch system is to promote justice and resolve national problems based on the constitution.

2. This idea was important to be exhibited in the Supreme Court because it shows that there is only justice in a country if the law is obeyed, because justice is subject to the law..

3. It is likely that, in this case, the person responsible for the law was the President of the United States, as he is the head of the executive branch. This would be problematic because it would allow the president to manipulate the law in his own favor, allowing him to abuse power without being punished whenever he wants to.

You might be interested in
The measure of how much we understood and learned in a college course is referred to as:
Andru [333]
D. Assignments are being provided to students in order to measure how good much they have learned after the lesson has been taught. Case studies are being done as activities to apply what they have learned through the use of research. Testing is to see how much they have learned throughout the course.
4 0
4 years ago
If you are made up of prokaryotic cells what features will you process?​
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

if we are made up of prokaryotic cell we would have extra layer of protection.ans it also helps to maintain cell shape .

3 0
3 years ago
Material that is common knowledge Select one:________.
Zina [86]

Answer:

d. does not require a citation.

Explanation:

if you know it and you put it in your words and didn't quote or paraphrase from a source, you don't need to cite. if you used the information from a source. always cite.

7 0
4 years ago
Check My Work Andy wrote a defamatory statement regarding Sam which he did not show to anyone but which he posted on the campus
katrin [286]

Andy has committed the tort of libel. Defamation means “The offense of injuring a person's character, fame, or reputation by false and malicious statements"

Defamation :

A statement that harms a third party's reputation, honour, or dignity is considered defamatory. It may be written or spoken. It is a tort and/or a criminal offence. Between nations and jurisdictions, there can be significant differences in the manner that defamation and related offences are defined and punished.

A false statement that is presented as fact and damages the reputation of the subject of the statement is called defamation. "Tom Smith stole money from his employer," as an illustration. If this isn't accurate and saying it hurts Tom's reputation or ability to get a job, it's defamation.

Learn more about defamation here:

brainly.com/question/5238303

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
A primary reason for Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan was that he
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

The main reason was to end world war 2. The war was still going on and onl japan hasn’t surrendered. Truman decided to drop 2 atomic bombs on Japan to force them into surrendering and they did after the second bomb dropped. Many civillian lives were sacrificed to end world war 2.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In general, Americans with high incomes vote at
    14·1 answer
  • Spanish explorer Hernando de Soto was likely the first European to...
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the similarities and differences among digital forensic investigations in civil, criminal, and private cases
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the battle of stalingrad an important victory for the allies
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST explains the point of this passage by President Monroe?
    8·2 answers
  • All of the following are characteristics of SMART goals except
    15·1 answer
  • Why are some birds able to talk?
    6·2 answers
  • According to researchers, teens who start smoking typically have _____ who model smoking and offer cigarettes.
    5·1 answer
  • When swiss psychiatrist eugen bleuler coined the term "schizophrenia," the kind of split that he believed was central to the dis
    11·1 answer
  • What is both a right and responsibility for citizens who live in a democracy
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!