The formula for the slope is
Hope this helps.
頑張って!
Answer:
(a) No the conclusion is not justified.
b. No
c. Two defective circuits in the sample
Step-by-step explanation:
Ans: (a) No the conclusion is not justified. What is important is the percentage population of defectives;
the sample proportion is only an approximation. The population proportion
for the new process may be more than or less than that of the old process. We can decide to pick two hundred samples and discover that the number of defects is greater than the previous process
(b)
.For the defectives, the population proportion for the new process may be 0.12 or more,
although the sample of defectives is just 11 out of 100
(c) Two defective circuits in the sample. This is because the probability of having two defects from the 100n samples is less than having 11 defects
Answer:
x³ - 5x² + 8x - 6
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) × g(x)
= (x² - 2x + 2)(x - 3)
Each term in the first factor is multiplied by each term in the second factor, that is
x(x² - 2x + 2) - 3(x² - 2x + 2) ← distribute both parenthesis
= x³ - 2x² + 2x - 3x² + 6x - 6 ← collect like terms
= x³ - 5x² + 8x - 6
(2*3*1)=6
135/6=22.5
1st = 22.5 ft
2nd= 45 ft
3rd = 67.5 ft
add it up and you get 135 feet
Answer:
C.
Step-by-step explanation:
rolling a cube would have six possible but then flipping a coin would mean it would be 12.