False there are plent of examples on google examples of acronyms.
Considering the situation described above, this is a <u>Macro-level approach</u>, and the theoretical approach to sociology <em>Durkheim</em> was using is <u>Structural Functionalism.</u>
<h3>What is a Macro-Level Approach in Sociology?</h3>
The <em><u>macro-level approach</u></em> or theory assesses how the entire society or community interacts, usually between the components such as people and the environments.
Similarly, <u>Structural </u><u>Functionalism</u> is one of the <em><u>Macro-Level</u></em> Approaches that focus on society and its components.
Given that Durkheim focused on the way each segment of society does its part, as members of a team, this is an example of Structural Functionalism.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Durkheim used <em><u>Structural Functionalism</u></em> to understand his study, a form of <em><u>Macro-Level approach</u></em>.
Learn more about Macro-Level Approach here: brainly.com/question/8202286
Answer and Explanation:
Intrinsic motivation: It will allow James to have confidence in his abilities and to believe that he will be able to overcome all the difficulties that may arise and that will try to prevent him from winning.
Epinephrine: It is the hormone that allows an individual's body to feel ready to do great things, which will generate very beneficial and great results.
Somatic nervous system: It will provide motor impulses to the muscles, allowing JAmes to perform the correct movements to achieve his goals.
Self-efficacy: It will allow James to believe that the commitment and effort he has had is sufficient to make him able to achieve his goals within the game.
Arousal theory: It will make James very excited to win the game, and can make him act inconsequential and very desperate, disrupting his performance.
Proactive interference: It can overload James' brain, making him forget essential information for the game to win.
External locus of control: It will make sure that James does not believe he is in control of the situation, causing him to not know what to do and to start acting unthinkingly.
I feel like the answer to your question is B
Answer: 1. Breaking the law
2. Violating ethical standards
Explanation:
1. A doctor gives out confidential patient health information to friends at a dinner party.
Here, the doctor is breaking the law. Giving out someone's confidential information without the consent of the person is wrong. The doctor can be jailed for doing such as he is breaking the law.
2. A doctor withholds information from a patient about the patient's health because he is worried about how
the patient might react.
This is a violation of ethical standards. Ethical standards are principles that underlies moral values. The doctor isn't meant to withold the information from the patient as the patient has the right to know what's happening regarding his or her health.
