I believe the answer is: <span>agoraphobia
The victim's perception on which places they considered to be 'safe' would be depended on the severity of their </span><span>agoraphobia.
In extreme cases, the victim of </span><span>agoraphobia would perceive all places outside their own home to be dangerous and choose to live completely excluded from society.</span>
The correct answers are A) increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and D) pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
<em>The outcomes that are possible negative externalities are increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and D) pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
</em>
In economics, a negative externality is a cost that a third party suffers from an economic transaction. In this case, the first person is the CEO of the Company that plans to open a new fabric. He receives a benefit. The second person is the workers for the benefits of new jobs and continual education. The third person that is affected with the negative externalities is the people from the surrounding neighborhood, because the negative outcomes are going to be increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
Reifman (1991) found that as temperatures rise to the hot range, major league baseball pitchers are more likely to hit batters with a pitch. This finding is consistent with<u> ‘The Heat-Aggression Relationship.’</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the major baseball league games, a data was conducted by Reifman (1991) to find out the Heat Aggression Relationship. In this study Reifman wanted to know that when the temperature increases, do pitchers develop aggression or not? And the study showed that as the heat increases, so does the aggressiveness of the pitchers.
They throw balls with such belligerence that they distinctly hit the batters. This shows how temper and temperature are linked and higher the temperature, higher is the likelihood of an increase in temperament.
The use of this staff is<u> "Wrong and is prohibited; subject selection needs to be free from intervention by prison authorities or prisoners."</u>
Since prisoners are defenseless by their imprisonment, it is essential that examination with detainees don't force encourage imperatives on willfulness of their choices. Analysts must upgrade the willfulness of a detainee's assent by limiting the impact of other individuals, particularly staff or detainees who may practice discretionary expert over these potential subjects. Subject choice should be reasonable inside the populace that conceivably meets the examination criteria.
The 2nd one: What social skills are built by playing sports.
