The answer would be true because the moon has no atmosphere.
Only Earth does and is the only planet.
Hope I answered your question!
The sustainable development of South America matters for the citizens of the United States because of environmental issues.
Explanation:
South America is home to the largest tropical rainforest in the world, the Amazon rainforest. This forest is nicknamed ''the lungs of Earth'', and that's because it produce the largest amount of oxygen. Not just that it produces the most oxygen, but this rainforest has the highest biodiversity, both of plants and animals.
The US citizens want the development of South America to be sustainable because they realize the dangers if the development is not sustainable. If the South American countries develop in a non sustainable manner and the Amazon forest is destroyed, the implications for the whole world would be very bad. The global temperatures will rise, the pollution will rise, and many industries will suffer because they will lose their materials.
The countries that have the biggest share of the Amazon rainforest are:
- Brazil
- Peru
- Paraguay
- Ecuador
- Colombia
- Bolivia etc.
Learn more about sustainable development brainly.com/question/12871790
#learnwithBrainly
Answer: Lignite Bituminous and Anthracite, are the correct answers.
Answer:
1st Choice
Explanation:
The Equator goes directly "through" the earth. Though it isn't actually visible or an actual line through the earth, it is a universal marking that divides both the hemispheres.
Answer:
Explanation:
The belief that material possessions improve individuals’ personal and social well-being permeates America. Think about it: If someone is bombarded with images or reminders of wealth, such an abundance of investment banks nearby or neighbors driving luxury cars, they are likely to feel a need to spend money they may not have to project an image of wealth they don't actually possess. Living in a strong local economy may change an individual’s comparison standards and encourage individuals to socially compare with respect to their material belongings, style, and consumption patterns
