Answer:
People read, saw, and heard only what the government desired.
Leaders came to power through secret internal power struggles.
I hope this is right!!
The question is incomplete, hence the options were not given. But the options was found on another websites.
Here are the options;
- Montgomery Bus Boycott affected the civil rights movement?
- The boycott led to Montgomery being ignored by the movement.
- The boycott started a massive nonviolent movement.
- The boycott caused Martin Luther King Jr. to lose credibility.
- The boycott ended segregation in public facilities in the South.
The boycott started a massive nonviolent movement best summarises Montgomery Bus Boycott.
<h3>What is Montgomery Bus Boycott?</h3>
Montgomery Bus Boycott was a civil right, political and social protest which was based on racial segregation mass transit system.
It started on 5th Dec. 1955 after the arrest of Rosa parks on 1st of Dec., 1955.
It was a 13 month public mass transit protest which put an end to U.S supreme Court ruling that segregation on public transport system is not constitutional.
This occur when African Americans refused to ride in public buses in Montgomery Alabama and this led to the protest.
Therefore, The boycott started a massive nonviolent movement best summarises Montgomery Bus Boycott.
For more details on Montgomery Bus Boycott, check the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/1199306.
The jews were not treated the same as the germans
Explanation: Democracy in itself is a system in which people directly or indirectly decide important issues and political decisions. Like any other system, democracy also carries with it the germ of corruption that corrupts the system from within, which in perspective, as something does not change, leads to a certain form of tyranny. When corruption starts destroying the system, then the system is no longer guided by the interests of citizens, but by the interests of individuals or interest groups. To prevent this, there are political parties that represent the opinions, attitudes and lifestyles of different social classes, groups, and even types of people. These political parties confront the views, or so it should be, of those they represent and influence political decisions on all sides, shape and balance the system as much as possible. By combining party attitudes and policies, democracy, to the greatest extent possible, is never fully possible, is designed to meet the needs of the majority as much as possible.
