Answer:
Negative
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the value of A is larger than B, and A is negative, we go with the sign of A which ends up being negative.
Have a nice day!
If this is not what you are looking for - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
- Heather
Answer:
<u>The value of the missing number is 6, as denominator of the mixed number 5 1/6</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's find the value of the missing number, this way:
5 1/2 + 5 1/? = 10 4/6
Converting mixed numbers to fractions:
If we observe carefully, we notice than both mixed numbers on the left start with 5 as whole number and their sum are the whole number of the result of the right
5 + 5 = 10
Therefore, just let's work with the fractions, this way:
1/2 + 1/? = 4/6
1/? = 4/6 - 1/2
1/? = 4/6 - 3/6
1/? = 1/6
<u>The value of the missing number is 6, as denominator of the mixed number 5 1/6</u>
Answer:
331.38$
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
9 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
Atea = length* width
what two numbers multiply to 72 but are one number apart
9 * 8
9 is the length since the width is given as being shorter.
other numbers can multiply to 72 but they are not one number apart.
Answer: "greater than" for each of the 4 dropdown menus
======================================================
Explanation:
Divide each value in the table by 40
You should get:
- Horse = 15/40 = 0.375
- Cow = 12/40 = 0.300
- Sheep = 14/40 = 0.350
- Pig = 19/40 = 0.475
Those decimal results are the experimental (ie empirical) probabilities. Theoretically, we should get 1/4 = 0.250 for each sticker type assuming each sticker is likely to be chosen. As you can see, each decimal value shown above is larger than the theoretical target of 0.250, so each answer is "greater than"
-----------
Here's another way to see why this is:
If we had 40 stickers total, and each animal has the same number of stickers, then we should have 40/4 = 10 stickers per animal type. But the table shows each frequency is above 10. So that must directly mean the empirical probability of picking any animal is greater than the theoretical probability.