The answer is C (the main idea is always found at the beginning of a paragraph.)
The use of vague language allows them to say things in a very generic way so that they can account for what they say, any more precise language can become compromising for them as they will be asked in the future to account for what they said, so a sentence like "we will do our best to erradicate corruption" is vague and if a politician is asked to account for this they can say "well, we have been doing our best but it is not easy", now if they say "we will erradicate corruption in our government within the next three years." people can ask them to account for these exact words.
Opinion because you could rob millionaires house and be in the shadow of the police and that doesnt make you successful
I would say that the answer might be c) Steinbeck compares the migrants anger to the grapes ready to be harvested and it is also appeal to the Gods to bring to justice those responsible for wreaking havoc on the land and people.This was in relation to the dustbowl conditions caused during the 1930's in the US and its toll on the grape harvests in California and the migrant workers who picked the grapes.
Hello ,
I hope you are having a wonderful day
I think your questuion May be missing a passage For me to answer your question can you please provide a passage or a paragraph or something .
I hope I can help you asap :)
-Sprinkles