Answer:
Study objects, conduct tests, research written materials, and ask questions
Answer:
a breakthrough project
Explanation:
Having competitive advantage <em>implies</em> being in a condition or circumstance that puts an organisation in a favorable business position.
Therefore, a Breakthrough Project would create a competitive advantage that enables the organization to earn a greater than normal return on investment than its competitors, because it is like a<em> disruptive innovation.</em>
Answer:
Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act
Explanation:
Here fundamentally, the act which will be acted on the given sentence is generally known as Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act. Unfair claims practice is the inappropriate restraint of a request by an insurer or an endeavor to diminish the intensity of the claim. By interlacing in unfair claims practices, an insurer strives to diminish its values. Nevertheless, this is unlawful in various jurisdictions. Additionally, most maximum states possess formulated a version of this type of rule. Denominated essentially the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, it defends safeguard consumers from the unfair manner by insurers in the appeals settlement method.
Answer:
A. Reject (Alternative 1) $0.00
Accept (Alternative 2) $1.12
Differentials Effect on income (Alternative 2) $1.12
B. Accepted (Alternative 2)
Explanation:
a. Preparation of a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Reject (Alternative 1) or Accept (Alternative 2)
March 16
Reject Accept Differentials Effect on income
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2) (Alternative 2)
Revenue per unit $0.00 $7.20 $7.20
Costs:
Variable manufacturing costs per unit
$0.00 -$5.00 -$5.00
Export tariff per unit
$0.00 -$1.08 -$1.08
($7.20*15%=$1.08)
Income (Loss) per unit $0.00 $1.12 $1.12
b. Based on the above differential analysis
the special order should be ACCEPTED (Alternative 2).
Answer:
The answer is option C. She may immediately sell the bonds but it is unclear how much money they will sell for.
Explanation:
She may immediately sell the bonds but it is unclear how much money they will sell for.
Investors who hold onto their bonds until maturity are assured of to receive the face value of the bond. In our case, if Andrea would have chosen to hold her $5,000 bond investment for 10 years, she would have been assured the bonds face value, however since she prefers to use the cash to work abroad, she can sell the bonds immediately.
Selling a bond before it's maturity date can either be beneficial or detrimental. This depends on the value of the bond at the time of sale. If at the time of sale the bond would have gained value, then the bond will sell at a higher price than when it was bought. On the other hand, if the bond at the time of sale has lost value, then the bond will sell at a lower price than the price which it was bought.
In our case, the best option for Andrea would be to sell the bonds immediately, since she really needs the cash. If it happens that at the point at which she sells the bonds they will have gained value, then she will have more than $5,000 cash, however, if at the point she decides to sell the bonds they will have lost value, then she will have less than $5,000 depending on how much value was lost from the time she bought the bonds and the time she sold the bonds.
