Answer:
The false statement is letter "A": We say a portfolio is an efficient portfolio whenever it is possible to find another portfolio that is better in terms of both expected return and volatility.
Explanation:
An effective portfolio is a portfolio with the highest expected revenue for a given risk level or a portfolio with the lowest risk level for a given expected revenue. When the portfolio has reached either one of the two points it is said that it has reached its efficient frontier.
In that case, option "A" is false since the portfolio efficiency has nothing to do with the similarity it may have with another one.
Answer:
Variable cost = $340,200
Fixed cost = $220,000
Explanation:
Given that,
At Predicted production = 24,200 units,
Fixed costs = $220,000
Variable costs = $435,600
Per unit variable cost:
= Variable costs ÷ No. of units produced
= $435,600 ÷ 24,200
= $18 per unit
Total cost at 24,200 units,
= Variable costs + Fixed cost
= $435,600 + $220,000
= $655,600
Total cost at 18,900 units,
= Variable costs + Fixed cost
= ($18 × 18,900) + $220,000
= $340,200 + $220,000
= $560,200
Note: Fixed cost does not changes with the change in the output level.
Given the situation described above, Alma will be able to cast <u>50 votes</u>.
This is because common stock gives voting rights to shareholders. And given that Alma has 50 shares of common stocks. Therefore, he would be able to cast 50 votes.
On the other hand, preferred stocks give no voting rights to shareholders.
However, preferred shareholders have preference over a company's revenue or earnings, which implies that they are paid dividends before common shareholders.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "50 votes."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3518273
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": False.
Explanation:
Anticipatory repudiation is the act by which one party notifies the other intentions of not continuing with their relationship -typically tied to a contract- because of different factors. Those factors sometimes are specified in the terms of the contract and must be met for a Court to qualify the case as an anticipatory breach.
Thus, in the example, <em>Helen should retract her anticipatory breach since she will be able to make the payments for the gas service even though Paris changed the supplier.</em>