Answer and explanation:
After carefully reading these lines above and doing some deep research on the present case of study, I personally believe it is fair to conclude that the appellate court ruled on appeal the following way:
Holmes appealed. However, the appeallate court decided to confirm the jury's verdict. The jury rejected Holmes's arguments that the words used by the celebrity might have wanted to imply a bribe. If the suited statement was meant to be a false claim of bribery, then the situation would have constituted an act of true malice as a matter of law and as required by public figures claiming defamation.
Answer:
were
Explanation:
according to me it seems correct but tell me if am wrong please i wouldnt mind corrections
Answer:
B
Explanation:
a drunk person can hardly concentrate on something especially driving coz he'll be dizzy
Answer:
A
Explanation:
But if its wrong you should pick B
