Answer:
a. 13.33%
b. 10%
c. 8%
d. 5.71%
Explanation:
The computation of nominal rate of return is given below:-
Rate of return = Dividend ÷ Current market price
For the first case
= $8 ÷ $60
= 13.33%
For the second case
= $8 ÷ $80
= 10%
For the third case
= $8 ÷ $100
= 8%
For the fourth case
= $8 ÷ $140
= 5.71%
Note :- To get $8 you need to multiply by $100 by the 8%
A) increase the efficiency of gift-giving because they allow the recipient to consume goods that provide greater utility and transfer away those goods that are less satisfying.
Utility is the satisfaction that a consumer gets from a good or service, and picking the items that they want themselves provides the best efficiency of choosing goods.
The type of company which is required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to have a code of ethics available to all employee is:
- all companies that have more than a single owner.
<h3>What is Code of Ethics?</h3>
This refers to the guidelines about the way a group of people should behave in a social group or official setting.
With that in mind, we can see that the type of company which is required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to have a code of ethics available to all employees is one which has more than one owner.
Read more about code of ethics here:
brainly.com/question/24606527
Answer:
The difference between charismatic leadership and transformational leadership is: Charismatic leadership gravitates around the leader and the persona of the leader. Transformational centers around a common vision and focuses on improving and evolving all team members to reach another level.
Yes , Judy and Kristy have an enforceable binding contract
Explanation:
Kristy Johnston, Judy Olsen, and Joyce Johnston, their mother, owned real estate as common buyers. After Joyce died, she left Kristy her one-third share in the house. Kristy sent Judy a letter in 2009 promising Judy to purchase or sell Judy's share in the property.
Judy accepted the sale bid from Kristy. Kristy then tried to refuse Judy's approval and to cancel her bid for sale. Judy lodged a Kristy lawsuit.
The court granted the summary judgment to Judy finding that a contract had been drawn up between the letters exchanged between Judy and Kristy which satisfied the frauds ' status. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court decided out that an enforceable arrangement was established by exchanging letters from the parties.
