1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
5

HELP! The deadline to turn in all assignments for the semester is tonight, so please help if you know the answers. Thanks :)

History
2 answers:
DanielleElmas [232]3 years ago
8 0
1. Dictator<span> Porfirio Díaz 
2. The United States
3. </span>Plutarco Elías Calles
Karolina [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: 3.

Explanation: General Álvaro Obregón was reelected as president in 1928 and later killed by a religious fanatic.

You might be interested in
Assassination of Abraham Lincoln narrative almost like you were present at the time of his assassination.
Alexxx [7]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Abraham Lincoln was fatally shot in the head while he was watching the staged play at night around 10 pm at the Ford's Theatre in Washington, by a popular stage actor known as John Wilkes Booth on April 14, 1865.

John Wikes Booth in an unsuspecting manner walked closer and entered the Presidential box before shooting his 44 caliber pistol known as Derringer. Abraham Lincoln died about 9 hours later around 7 am at the Petersen House which is located opposite the theater.

6 0
3 years ago
When campaign workers are canvassing neighborhoods, one of their goals is to identify voters who will support their candidate. s
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

identify voters who will support their candidate

Explanation:

A political campaign is an organized effort which seeks to influence the decision making progress within a specific group.

In democracies, political campaigns often refer to electoral campaigns, by which representatives are chosen or referendums are decided.

Canvassing is the systematic initiation of direct contact with individuals, commonly used during political campaigns.

Canvassing can be done for many reasons: political campaigning, grassroots fundraising, community awareness, membership drives, and more. Campaigners knock on doors to contact people personally.

While electoral canvassers purpose is to assist the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) with the annual compilation of the Register of Electors.

You will be required to visit all properties you are assigned and make attempts to obtain a completed form for these properties.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a medical doctor wants to check Elena's cognitive ability, which of the
____ [38]

Answer:

<em>"The doctor will give her a series of tests to see how well she can think"</em>

Explanation:

"Cognitive" relates to cognition, the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses—basically, all the super-important brain stuff.

The first option relating to the eyes would be something more suited towards an ophthalmologist (fancy word for 'eye doctor'). The third matches more towards cardiac and respiratory problems, heart things and lung/breathing stuff respectively. The final tests for your reflexes and muscles.

Using the process of elimination (and some funky words), the awnser becomes clear: the second choice (or "B.") is most likely true.

Hope this helps! Brainliest appreciated.

6 0
3 years ago
schools started desegregated immediately in Georgia after the Brown versus Board of Education decision true or false​
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

In 1964, a full decade after the decision, more than 98 percent of Black children in the South still attended segregated schools.

Answered by None other than the <u>ONE</u> & <em>ONLY</em> <u><em>#QUEEN</em></u> herself aka <u><em>#DRIPPQUEENMO.</em></u>

<u><em>HOPE THIS HELPED!!</em></u>

8 0
2 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A meeting of party members to choose a nominee through debate is called a
    9·2 answers
  • Identify and describe three codes of laws or other legal documents that have influenced modern democracy
    12·1 answer
  • 8) Describe Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' THREE main points in the Communist Manifesto.​
    10·1 answer
  • Which information source do political campaigns have complete control over?
    13·1 answer
  • What year was the safety elevator invented
    10·2 answers
  • How does this event support the resolution of the story??​
    15·1 answer
  • Those who herd flocks and do not settle in one place are called<br><br> Provide evidence
    10·1 answer
  • Us.history Help my plis
    15·1 answer
  • WHAT IS THIS ANSWER HELP
    14·2 answers
  • The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution lists six goals, including which of the following?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!