President Franklin Roosevelt called December 7, 1941, "a date which will live in infamy." On that day, Japanese<span> planes </span>attacked<span> the </span>United States Naval Base at Pearl Harbor<span>, Hawaii Territory. The </span>bombing<span> killed more than 2,300 Americans. It completely destroyed the </span>American<span> battleship U.S.S.</span>
Answer:
The Europeans brought technologies, ideas, plants, and animals that were new to America. This would transform peoples' lives forever.
Explanation:
The difference between the second and first generation of
Indochinese immigrants is they refuse the French culture. The
correct answer between all the choices given is the second choice. I am hoping
that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in
your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
Answer:
Due to lost of their property.
Explanation:
The Indian removal act has a negative economic impact on the American Indian tribes that were relocated to Oklahoma because they lost all their property that was present at their original place. They have to start their lives from the beginning and lives according to the available resources of that Oklahoma location. They were not paid for their property by the American government which leads to bad economic condition.
Answer:
The constitutionality of the Act was challenged by states based on two main grounds: 1. The issue of individual mandate; and 2. Mandatory expansion of medicaid by states.
Explanation:
The Affordable Healthcare Act otherwise known as Obamacare was a health reform Act that came into force in 2010 under the Obama administration in the United States of America which made provision for affordable health insurance for every citizen of America, and also expanded the scope of eligibility for medicaid in the United States of America. The constitutionality/legality of the Act was challenged by a total of about 26 states of the United States of America particularly on the ground that the Act imposed sanctions on states which failed to expand the medicaid, and on the ground of individual mandate to purchase health insurance violated the original Clause.
However, concerning the issue of individual mandate to buy health insurance, the Supreme Court of America upheld the constitutionality of the ACA on the ground that the congress has the valid and constitutional power to impose tax.
On the other hand, on the issue of mandatory expansion of medicaid by states, the court stated that it was optional and not mandatory for states to chose to expand the medicaid, thereby declaring the mandatory medicaid expansion by states unconstitutional.
