Answer:
Ang Turismo
Turismo ay tumutukoy sa aktong paglalabay ng isang tao,ang pagtungo sa ibat-ibang lugar o rehiyon ng ating bansa, ito ay upang masilayan kung gaano kaganda ang isang bayan, sinasabing ang isang tao na naglakbay ng 50 milya o 80.5 kilometro ang layo mula sa kanyang tirahan ay tinatawag ng Turista iyan ay ayon sa World Rourism Organization.
DOT o Department of Tourism, ay ang ahensyang namamahala upang hikayatin at paunlarin ang turismo sa ating bansa. Ang pagdami ng turismo sa isang bansa ay napakahalaga maraming mamamayan ang nabibigyan ng trabaho, malaking tulong din upang umunlad ang ekonomiya ng isang bansa.
Ang industriyang serbisyo pangturismo
Transpostasyon panghimpapawid
Transpostasyon Riles
Transpostasyon Kalye
Transpostasyon tubig
Akomodisyon
Pagkain at inumin
Paglilibot
Mga subenir
Seguridad at kaligtasan
Buksan ang link parasa karagdagang kaalaman
Ang kahalagahan ng turismo sa ating bansa brainly.ph/question/972956
Paraan paano makatutulong upang mapaunlad ang turismo sa ating bansa? brainly.ph/question/866958
#LearnWithBrainly
Explanation:
The coastal lowland and bays provided harbors, thus the middle colonies were able to provide trading opportunities where the three regions meet in market towns and cities. The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.
Answer:Manifest Destiny, in U.S. history, the supposed inevitability of the continued territorial expansion of the boundaries of the United States westward to the Pacific and beyond. Before the American Civil War (1861–65), the idea of Manifest Destiny was used to validate continental acquisitions in the Oregon Country, Texas, New Mexico, and California. The purchase of Alaska after the Civil War briefly revived the concept of Manifest Destiny, but it most evidently became a renewed force in U.S. foreign policy in the 1890s, when the country went to war with Spain, annexed Hawaii, and laid plans for an isthmian canal across Central America.
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
