Answer:
A) None
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst, for example, if s = 3, t = 4, and n = 12, then both s and t are factors of n, but 
is not a factor of nst = 144.
2) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst. Let s be 4, let t be 6, and let n be 12. Then n is a factor of both s and t, but 
is not a factor of nst = 12*24. In fact, it is a greater number.
3) Again, s+t isnt necessarily a factor of nst, let s be 2 and t be 3. Then both s and t are factor of n = 12. However 5 = s+t is not a factor of nst = 72.
So, neither of the three options is guaranteed to be a factor of nst. In fact, for s = 4, t = 6, and n = 12, none of the three options are valid.
Answer:
-1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-0.2, 1/5, 1.35
Step-by-step explanation:
-0.2 is the only negative, therefore it has the least value
1/5 can be shown as 0.5 which is less than 1.35
Answer:
9 tapes
Step-by-step explanation:
First, subtract the handling charge from his $78.
78 - 3.50 = 74.5
So, Brian has $74.50 to purchase tapes. Each tape costs $7.50, so let's find out how many he can purchase.
74.50 / 7.50 = 9.933 (approximately)
Since Brian can't buy 0.933 of a tape, he will only be able to buy 9 tapes.
Answer:
wh
at am I helping u wit lol use googl
