1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
14

What happens in a market economy?

History
1 answer:
Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is choice A
You might be interested in
How can effectivr state laws best support a fair election process? A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registrati
solniwko [45]

Answer:

A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places

Explanation:

It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.

It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Mexican Cession added to the United States A. new territory that extended to the Canadian border in the North. B. a small pa
zubka84 [21]

The correct answer is D. new territory that contributed to the formation of seven new states.

After the Mexican-American War, the US and Mexico agreed to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This treaty favored the United States heavily, as they won the Mexican-American War. The ultimate goal of this war was to gain land from Mexico, which they accomplished. The Mexican Cession resulted in the United States gaining several thousand square miles of territories. This would result in the creation of states like California, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, etc.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Addressed the issue of allowing states to decide whether they wanted to be free or to allow slavery.
Marrrta [24]

Answer: The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated “popular sovereignty”–allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state's borders.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Describe the causes of the undeclared war with france, and explain adams's decision to seek peace rather than declare war
dusya [7]

The French were infuriated at Jay’s Treaty•Instead of fighting France, Adams sent envoys to try to make peace with France•The envoys were met with bribes, but refused what would be called the XYZ affair•Adams was able to restrict fighting to the West Indies7.Describe the poisonous political atmosphere that produced the Alien and Sedition Acts andthe Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.•The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans despised each other, and theFederalist Congress wanted them out of the country•The Alien Laws made it legal to deport “dangerous” foreigners, most of them poorDemocratic Republicans•The Sedition Act made it illegal for someone to speak out against the government, adirect encroachment of the rights in the Bill of Rights•The reaction was the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions made it possible to nullifyCongressional decisions8.Describe the contrasting membership and principles of the Hamiltonian Federalists and theJeffersonian Republicans, and how they laid the foundations of the American political partysystem.•The Democratic-Republicans believed in states’ rights, a Franco-American Alliance,a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and the removal of the national bank•The Federalists supported Hamilton’s financial policies, favored loose interpretationof the Constitution, and enjoyed a more powerful federal government•This set the stage for the political parties’ arguments during the election of 1800
7 0
3 years ago
George Washington was elected the first President of the United States<br> by<br> vote.
Ksju [112]
Are you asking how many votes? if so, it’s 69
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the message of Thomas paine's common sense?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes recent changes in South Korea
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Brown v. Board of Education decision so important?
    6·1 answer
  • ¿como catalogan los periodicos antes de 1980 las practicas culuturales populares?
    12·1 answer
  • how might have the influence of the protestant reformation and the scientific revolution have contributed to the start of the en
    7·2 answers
  • How did Cattle Ranching first start in Texas?
    15·2 answers
  • In approximately what year did the Mycenae Greeks establish their first fortification?
    11·2 answers
  • The programs in the chart represent efforts to<br> Combat which of the following problems?
    10·1 answer
  • Who received federal benefits after world war 2
    10·1 answer
  • The twentieth century saw two world wars and several genocides. Yet, John Green says, the twentieth century was “by many measure
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!