1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
siniylev [52]
3 years ago
6

Why is the Texas government similar to that of the United States?

History
2 answers:
Alex787 [66]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement

Explanation:

Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

he Texas government is like that of the U.S. with its separation of powers by having three different branches of government. Each branch serves as a check and balance over the other one. Therefore, no branch will gain too much power. The Bill of Rights was added to protect the basic rights of citizens.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
¿Qué diferencia existe en la visión sobre el ser humano entre el medioevo y el renacimiento?
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

La visión sobre el ser humano y la propia sociedad cambió radicalmente entre el medioevo y el renacimiento. Específicamente, la concepción del hombre en su relación con lo divino, con la naturaleza y con el poder se modificó abruptamente.

Así, durante la Edad Media la concepción del hombre dentro de la sociedad era la de un simple siervo de Dios, enmarcado en sociedades de profunda ideología religiosa que regulaba con sus propios dogmas el comportamiento de los individuos. A su vez, el poder político obtenía su legitimación de la propia religión, con lo cual la servidumbre se trasladaba a los señores feudales y los reyes que ejercían el poder en dicha época. Por lo tanto, la humanidad era teocentrista, basando su propia existencia en la visión religiosa y la adoración de un Dios.

En cambio, el Renacimiento vino a romper con dicha estructura de pensamiento. En esta etapa, se pasó de considerar a la religión como fuente de legitimación política, cultural e intelectual a poner dicha legitimación en la razón y los hechos objetivos, desplazando a Dios del centro de la escena y poniendo al hombre en su lugar. La sociedad, entonces, se convirtió en antropocéntrica, basando su propia existencia en el bienestar del hombre y el razonamiento como método de justificación de las relaciones humanas y de poder, surgiendo como consecuencia el reconocimiento de los principales derechos humanos a la vida y la libertad.

5 0
4 years ago
List down 5 pros and 5 cons of having laws.<br><br><br><br> C.L.E
klemol [59]

Answer:

5,5

Explanation:

5 pros:

1)Uniformity and Certainty:

Law provides Uniformity and certainty to the administration of justice. The same law has to be applied in all cases. There can be no distinction between one case and another case if the facts are the same.

2)Protection against arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions:

If the administration of Justice is left completely to the individual discretion of a judge, improper motives and dishonest opinions could affect the distribution of justice. Law as Fixed Principles of the law of justice avoids the danger of arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions.

3)Freedom from errors of individual judgement:

The fixed principles of law protect the administration of justice from the errors of individual judgement. Commenting on this aspect of law, the Greek Philosopher Aristotle observed that "to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden." This, in other words, means that "law is not always necessarily wise but on the whole and in the long run it is wiser than those who administer it".

4)Reliability :

There is another advantage of law is its reliability. It is more reliable than the individual judgements of the Courts. The human mind is fallible and judges are no exception. The wisdom of the legislature which represents the wisdom of the people is safer and more reliable means of protection than the momentary fancy of the individual judge.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

5 cons:

1)The rigidity of law:

An Ideal legal system keeps on changing according to the changing needs of the people. But because of the rigidity of law, it is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society. There is always a gap between the advancement of society and the legal system prevailing in it. The lack of flexibility in law results in hardship and injustice to the people.

2)Conservative Nature:

Another disadvantage of law is that its Conservative Nature. Law is conservative in its approach. The Bar and Bench are generally conservative in their approach to the dispensation of justice. The result is is that very often the law is static. This is not conducive to a progressive society.

3)Formalism:

The Law suffers from excessive formalism greater emphasis laid on the form of law rather than its substance. Undue formalism causes unnecessary delay in dispensation of justice.

4)Complexity :

Another disadvantage of law is its Complexity. It is true that every law effort is made to make law as simple as possible but it is not possible to make every law simple. That is due to the Complex nature of modern society.Commenting on the advantages and disadvantages of law Salmond observed that if the benefits of the law are great, the evils too are not small. Be that it may, it cannot be denied law serves as an effective instrument of social change. Law must change to the changing condition.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

3 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer.
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
Ellis island is the answer ,angel island was on the west coast
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Although the United States and Great Britain sought no intervention in occupied countries after World War II, Russia did. True F
sergij07 [2.7K]
True. The United States and Great Britain practiced Isolationism.
6 0
3 years ago
The pilgrams and puritans___________?
givi [52]

Its not 1 because Pilgrams were Christians while Puritans were Catholic.

Its not 2. Because of prior research.

Its not 3, because of logic.

Its not 4 because of the distance of where they lived.

So my logical guess is NUMBER 5.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does this line illiterate about the speakers view of spirituality
    5·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP <br> What are differences between spitfire and biplane?
    8·1 answer
  • State governments must follow which type of laws?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following both had three major periods of civilization?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a drawback of the tiber river for the city of rome
    15·1 answer
  • The Soviet Union expanded ____________ to Eastern European countries, leading to the Cold War.
    8·1 answer
  • How do we know that vasco da gama was not an expert at sailing in the Indian ocean​
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Great Leap Forward fail in China?
    5·2 answers
  • Lincoln's attitude toward slavery was _____. that it should be kept below the missouri compromise line to the pacific that he di
    7·2 answers
  • I am in history class and I would like to know the definition of the word Rosetta Stone ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!