I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Answer:
violation to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution.
Explanation:
The Supremacy Clause incorporated in Article VI of the Constitution states that the federal law is the highest and final law of the country. It provides that every federal state law must adhere to the tenets of the constitution.
If any state laws conflict or are incompatible with federal statutes or the constitution, the federal government may declare them null and void through the Supremacy Clause. It gives the federal government the power to declare any state law as void and null.
Answer:
The only religion recognized in Middle Ages Europe was Christianity and specifically Catholicism. ... Religious institutors including the Church and the monasteries became wealthy and influential given the fact that the state allocated a significant budget for religious activitiesThe Catholic Church in Europe had a heavy influence during the High Middle Ages, the period from about 1000 to 1300 C.E. The Church was the center of life in medieval western Europe. ... During the Middle Ages, the Church was a daily presence from birth to death. It provided education and helped the poor and sick.
Explanation:
We need more info to answer this question
