1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ludmilkaskok [199]
2 years ago
8

Explain the separation of powers and why is important to the colonists?

History
1 answer:
lapo4ka [179]2 years ago
3 0

Answer Separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another. The intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.r:The separation of powers was important when the Founders wrote the U.S. Constitution and is still just as valuable today. ... When the United States won the American Revolution against Great Britain, the colonists became free from the rule of a king. hope this helps have a great night❤️❤️❤️

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLS HELP FAST FOR 50 POINTS AND BRAINIEST
andreev551 [17]

Answer:number 1.

The Stamp Act (March 1765) ...

The Townshend Acts (June-July 1767) ...

The Boston Massacre (March 1770) ...

The Boston Tea Party (December 1773) ...

The Coercive Acts (March-June 1774) ...

Lexington and Concord (April 1775

number 2.

Canada is a constitutional monarchy. The Queen, represented by the Governor General, is the head of state and the Prime Minister is the head of Government. The U.S. is a republic. The head of state and head of the Government are the same person: the President

number 3.

he environment influenced the cultures of the Southwest by the severe dry and hot climate. People would ask the gods for hopes of rain, good crops that year, etc. So, the Northwest didn't have to bother any gods for rain or for food, making them not as important to the Southwest.

Explanation:

research lol

5 0
1 year ago
How would you describe the relationship between FDR and Churchill? What were some of the important decisions they made together
sertanlavr [38]
I think their relationship wasn't really in friendly terms. I think their relationship is fueled by the idea of defeating Germany and Japan. Both leaders were good military strategists, they work on synchrony on how they can defeat their enemies. Roosevelt was the first to approach Churchill and was able to get him to supply the US with arms and a naval fleet in order to defeat Japan and Germany
3 0
3 years ago
How has communication between agencies changed after the<br> 9/11 attacks?
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Communication between agencies has changed because of 9/11 because now everyone is tense and on their toes of what had happened on that day because no one was expecting it and it was really, a big shock. Things between long distances people and especially more into protocols and rules, and now everyone is providing more secure and more high enlightened rules for people to go by so 9/11 doesn't happen again.  

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Hello guys wsp<br><br><br>I am in New York lol <br><br><br><br><br>​
trasher [3.6K]

Explanation:

All great...Nice to meet you

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the First Battle of Bull Run affect how the North viewed the Civil War?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the name of the labor organization of principally white, male, skilled workers that arose in the 1880's and was headed
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the most powerful Elder God who ruled over the other Titans?
    10·1 answer
  • Political party consisting of southerners and westerners who were committed to agriculture
    11·1 answer
  • Who won the Hull's and Harrison's Invasion of Canada Battle
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Dutch extract raw materials from their colonies in the East Indies?
    15·1 answer
  • The 38th parallel became an important dividing line between
    11·2 answers
  • Someone Help Plz!
    12·2 answers
  • How are the Fourth and Fifth amendments similar?
    14·2 answers
  • Which type of ruler is likely to rule using legalism?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!