Answer:
The structure of the article makes the author's argument more effective because the author shares factors that drive people from behaving correctly to behave incorrectly.
Explanation:
The option that is not a biased statement is the first one: Lawyers for both parties met in the courthouse today.
<u>A biased statement is a expression that presents an unfair prejudice against someone or a group</u>. It is a preconceived opinion without real proof. Moreover, biases generally contain generalizations. The last statement is a biased statement because it is incorrectly placing all lawyers into the same common category, whiñe the second and third statements are presenting an unfair opinion about two different people. In that way,<u> the first statement is the only one that it is exclusively referring to something that happened; therefore, it does not include any type of prejudice</u>.
If Selma wants to evaluate what went wrong when she tried to make this recipe, she should ask the following question: Did I dissolve the sugar before adding the final three ingredients?
This is the only one of the questions which refers to the specific recipe and the steps Selma should have followed, thus, evaluating what has happened.
<u>Question 1</u> asks about what can be done to improve what has already been done, so it doesn't refer to what has happened but rather to possible future steps that could impove the result.
<u>Question 2</u> tests the recipe but it doesn't assess Selma's performance on this one.
<u>Question 3</u> is irrelevant to the procedure followed as it compares this recipe to her mother's one and not the steps recommended in this recipe to the steps that Selma followed.
Answer:
It could be that the feud is so longstanding that the families themselves don't know why it started. The Montagues have always hated the Capulets and vice versa.
Explanation:
Good luck with your assignment! :)
