Answer: Alleged attacks by North Vietnam against US naval ships in the Gulf of Tonkin.
Detail:
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was a measure passed by US Congress that allowed the US President to make military actions, like increase troops, without formal declaration of war. It led to huge escalation of US involvement in the Vietnam War. The resolution was passed by Congress in August, 1964, after alleged attacks on two US naval ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. The key wording in the resolution said:
- <em>Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.</em>
That resolution served as a blank check for President Johnson to send troops to whatever extent he deemed necessary in pursuance of the war. Between 1964 and the end of Johnson's presidency in 1969, US troop levels in Vietnam increased from around 20,000 to over 500,000.
Answer:
Option A , B, D
Explanation:
In simple words, when the government increase the regulation on markets the interest for lending and borrowing also decreases to make sure that the poor ones could also use the money. Thus, resulting in decrease in housing prices.
The government will also regulate the prices of commodities so that everyone can enjoy the utilities of commodities and hence leading to lower corporate profits.
However, to fund the above two operations the government will need to have finance which will be done by increasing the taxes.
Answer:
Unfortunately. there are people willing to use dishonest methods, like making purchases with fake money. to take advantage of others
Explanation:
This is because the other answers just say that it's a crime or explain how companies defend against fraud.
Answer:
worcester vs Georgia significance
515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.
Prior: Plaintiff convicted in Gwinnett County, G...
Citations: 31 U.S. 515 (more)6 Pet. 515; 8 L. Ed. 483
Subsequent: None
Explanation:
Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em>
Credit sourced from "wikipedia"
