1. ANSWER: The Code of Hammurabi
Hammurabi set up the "Code of Hammurabi" with 282 laws and where the famous phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" came from. Although this code is actually more complex and less sinister-sounding than the phrase (which is not a direct quote, by the way), this legal system is meant to protect everyone abused, offering just compensation to everyone harmed.
In this system though, the accuser has to be the one to bring the accused to trial.
2. ANSWER: He wants to protect the abused.
Since Hammurabi was ruling a very diverse set of people, he set out to find a set of universal laws to govern everyone. He tapped legal experts to collect previously existing laws and examine them until he formed the Code with 282 laws.
Quoting Hammurabi directly, he said that he set out these laws "to make justice visible in the land, to destroy the wicked person and the evil-doer, that the strong might not injure the weak."
3. ANSWER: The laws influenced future cultures.
The Code of Hammurabi is often attributed as the first set of written laws to be uncovered. Although this may not be the case as there are older laws that were uncovered, being recognized as the first set of written laws often led leaders of future cultures to adopt the system, making these leaders lead the way Hammurabi led.
The process of learning the prison society and its expectations and rules is known as Prisonization.
When inmates first enter the prison they are considered to be outsiders by other inmates. Absence of independence and deprivation of essential rights leads to a sense of change in the new inmates, as they are introduced into the inmate culture. This process is termed Prisonization.
It enhances successful participation of inmates in prison society and results in the continuity of prison culture." Prisonization, like socialization, is an educational process whereby inmates learn prison culture through social interaction."
To learn more about Socialization,
brainly.com/question/5983351
#SPJ4
<span>Violent acts against
African Americans were frequently not punished because of the fact that the panel
of adjudicators and political leaders charged with impeaching these crimes were
often reassuring or even involved in these crimes, and the ideologies behind
them, themselves.</span>
