This is a tricky question, especially because we are not offered a context for the sentences. But, in my interpretation, the best option would be a colon.
A semicolon connects independent sentences - it has other uses, this is just one of them. That means that, in this case, both sentences should present a complete meaning in themselves. One should not need the other to make sense. However, the first sentence, on its own, is a bit lacking, especially because we do not have an object completing the verb "beat" at the end.
A colon introduces a sentence that is explaining, adding meaning, to the one before it. That seems to be what happens in this case. Why would no lunch beat? Because we had the best pizza in the whole world. The meaning of the first sentence is now complete.
D . installment
your welcome
Investigative journalism aims to uncover the truth about a particular subject, person, or event. While investigative journalism is based on the basic principle underlying all journalism-verification and accurate presentation of facts-investigative reporters must often work with uncooperative or recalcitrant sources who do not wish to divulge information. Renowned investigative journalism, such as Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s uncovering of the Watergate scandal, can upend major institutions significantly influence public life.
I believe the answer is: praise for Rosa Parks's act
The book mentioned how Rosa Park dare to speak up against injustice during racial segregation by sitting on the seat which is meant for white passengers.
Her actions obtained a lot of praise due to her courage in addressing discrimination, and this lead to a bigger activisms to eliminate racial segregation.
