Answer:
d. To study logic it is important to learn to employ language precisely
Explanation:
Our ability to communicate and be able to express what we have in mind through words is something that has characterized us as living beings.
Being able to schematize our ideas from a linguistic basis is one of the foundations of logic. The language we use carries with it the meaning of our reality, without this part there would be nothing for us.
On the practical level, if a person must speak or think in a language other than the native one, logic and mental flow simply feel natural for that particular language.
Each language has a particular way of categorizing mental concepts. There are data that correlate the learning of multiple languages with the stretching of the plasticity of our brain.
Our conceptual understanding is, at best, tenuous with respect to the logic of language. The circumstantial evidence points to a schematism in human language that is highly restricted, but also very rich and easy.
The answer is b because I said so
The specific aspect of literary criticism that demonstrates the author's message as significant or worthwhile is the author-based approach. It is also called the Expressive Theory. It depicts that the best interpretation of a text (poem, novel, fictional stories, etc) comes from the author himself.
The reader-based approach is not entirely reliable because every reader may see a text in a different perspective. There are even cases wherein readers interpret a text in a deep, deep way while the author meant everything in the literal sense. Everything varies from case to case.
Appeal to emotion. He's trying to manipulate people's emotions by saying things like ""deserves the love and thanks" which is very positive. Who wouldn't want to be loved and thanked by others? I think he's trying to say that if you fight, you will be honored.
Appeal to ethics is when the writer tries to convince the reader that he is knowledgeable about the subject like if he said, "As a doctor...." But he doesn't refer to himself in this passage.
Appeal to logic would be using facts, reasoning, evidence, and stuff, but I don't see a lot of facts here.
Appeal to authority would be him saying that because another person said something, it must be true. But he doesn't refer to anyone else here.
I believe it is Quantity.
