Answer:
1. Council members <u>deplored</u> the outbreak of violence in areas close to schools.
2. Several of the old buildings still retained the <u>ornate</u> ceilings and banisters that were typical of the eighteenth century.
3. During economic hardships, most people find <em><u>prodigal</u></em> spenders offensive.
Explanation:
The corresponding and appropriate vocabulary for the bolded words in the given sentences are changed as follows-
1. In replacing "grumbled about" with "deplored", they imply the same attitude but with much more strong opposition. While mere grumbling may suggest complaints and disinterest, 'deplored' gives a sense of strongly disapproving of the plan.
2. The word "stylish" can be replaced by "ornate" as they both imply the same decorative sense of the ceiling. But at the same time, "ornate" gives the sense of a more beautiful, better-decorated piece than the simple word "stylish".
3. The word "big" in describing the spenders is plain and can just describe any shopper who spends a lot. But the use of "prodigal" in describing the spenders gives the sense of unnecessary spending. This word gives more voice to the disapproving tone about such spenders.
I think the correct answer would be the third option. Using an implied main idea would not be a good strategy for writing a supporting sentence. These sentences should contain substance or evidences that would support the main idea of what you are writing. Using implied ideas would be very vague for the readers making the readers doubt on what message you are conveying. Supporting sentences should be straight to the point and be very specific and should provide a good foundation for the main idea. Using facts, examples and statistics that are verified by reliable people are very good strategies in writing supporting sentences.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
he asked this when he was sick because he thought it was just a dream and thought maybe johnny did not actually die
Answer:
Fostering good relationships with students will depend on the cumulative effect of positive interactions; some routine interactions won't rise to the level of high influence and affect.
Explanation:
The progress of positive relationships between educators and students is a crucial element of good teaching and scholar learning. This relationship determines how included students feel and boost their participation. This, of course, depends on the repercussions of positive interactions accumulating over time. On the other hand, the use of routines to promote interactions is effective in some cases but not in others.
