1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
3 years ago
12

Between 1960 and 1964, some white citizens protested with African Americans in the South in nonviolent actions. How did the resp

onse of Southerners opposed to integration change toward whites who joined Civil Rights actions at the time?
1. They gradually came to accept the change in their social structure.
2. They became increasingly violent, culminating in assault and murder.
3. They admired young whites for their actions and embraced the changes.
4. They reacted violently at first, then turned to legal challenges to fight integration.
History
2 answers:
BigorU [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

2. They became increasingly violent, culminating in assault and murder.

Explanation:

Non-violence or passive resistance is a technique for social change that utilizes procedures. It is viewed as ethically legitimate to gently oppose unreasonable laws. Martin Luther King trusted that direct, non-violent protest action would force whites to confront segregation laws.

He made it generally acknowledged that individuals utilize quiet dissent to constrain changes to the law. Many white people upheld him and joined the protests.  

Protests were regularly met with police and open violence. Numerous individuals were killed, yet Dr. King did not bolster utilizing savaviolence ery as a type of opposition.

Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) They became increasingly violent, culminating in assault and murder.

Between 1960 and 1964, some white citizens protested with African Americans in the South in nonviolent actions. The response of Southerners opposed to integration changed toward whites who joined Civil Rights actions at the time in that they became increasingly violent, culminating in assault and murder.

These were the times of the Civil Rights MOvement in which many organizations fought for the rights and liberties of African Americans in the South. There were many incidents such as the riots in the University of Mississippi, in Oxford, in 1962where President Kennedy had to send the federal troops to control the racial problems. Or the march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama in 1965 that was repressed by the police. Another incident was the assassination of Malcolm X in the same year. Or the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr in 1968.

You might be interested in
"slavery robs people of their humanity ", do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Schach [20]
I agree with that statement
6 0
3 years ago
What effect does the conclusion of the text, focused on the attack of Charles Sumner, have on the development of the central ide
11111nata11111 [884]

Inferred you are referring to Charles Sumner former US senator.

Answer:

It encourages sympathy

Explanation:

Remember, we are told Sumner spent three and a half years recovering from the beating resulting from the attack. Although he initially attacked someone, who's cousin later retaliated with physical attack against Sumner. This story of the attack is in line with the central idea of who is painted as the man- Charles Sumner, a fiece activist who got in anyone's way in making his views heard.

7 0
3 years ago
Why had the north and south grown part by 1862
suter [353]

Answer:

I would say because they needed props for the civil war. So they started to slave people and make lots of food. But the biggest was the balance of power in the federal government.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which government agency would be most likely to be included in the working group being established by this executive order?
MissTica

Answer:

Federal Communications Commission

Explanation:

...

5 0
3 years ago
How did the borders of Texas change as a result of the U.S. war with Mexico and the Compromise of 1850?
KatRina [158]

Answer:

The results of the Mexican War -1846–48- brought Texas into serious conflict with the national government over the state's claim to a large portion of New Mexico. By the provisions of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico relinquished all claim to territory north and east of the Rio Grande.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A key slogan that served as a rallying cry for members of Marcus Garvey's Universal Negro Improvement Association
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the role of superdelegates in the democratic party
    6·1 answer
  • Which historical event best fits the theme of "the defense of individual liberty"? A.In 1863, the U.S. government started a prog
    14·2 answers
  • How did magna carta contribute to future ways of government?
    13·2 answers
  • Write a two- or three-sentence statement that
    5·2 answers
  • 3 differences between hatshepsup AND ramses ll
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following women was responsible for establishing the American Red Cross? Mary Walker Antonia Ford Harriet Tubman Cl
    12·2 answers
  • How was chavin society structured
    6·2 answers
  • Where did fighting take place in the Far West?
    8·1 answer
  • Konkreto ang mga gagawin sa pag-aaral bilang pakikibahagi sa pagkamit ng kabutihang panlahat??​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!