Answer:
The Dark Ages was referencing the period between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance which is the 5th – 14th centuries. It was implied that this period saw little scientific and cultural advancement...
Explanation:
The Dark Ages were not good for anyone unless you were on the bottom 90% of the society...then the falling of the Western Empire meant an improvement. Slaver vanishes, the burdens of taxes on you were decreased, society became less confusing, regional production improved and people were in most cases, taller and healthier than during the Late Imperial period. The fact that all Continental Barbarian nations adopted Latin language and Roman law and attempted to salvage what salvageable was, meant civilization did not collapse altogether. If you were on the top 10% of the society, the Dark Ages were a catastrophe; the Empire was gone, as was the international trade, literacy had collapsed with the papyrus trade and hyperinflation had meant monetary trade had collapsed and replaced with barter trade.
Answer:
A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. It is also called a fallacy, an informal logical fallacy, and an informal fallacy. All logical fallacies are nonsequiturs—arguments in which a conclusion doesn't follow logically from what preceded it.
i found that on thoughtco.
Answer:
c.) The Australian government continues to discriminate against the indigenous people
He pointed out that the Articles of Confederation had weaknesses.
The Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were:
<span>Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size Congress didn't have the power to tax, or to regulate foreign and interstate commerce There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress There was no national court system. Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required a unanimous vote<span>. Laws required a 9/13 majority to pass in Congress</span></span>
Answer:
Essential items needed for the war effort were rationed