All categories

2 years ago

Analysis: Contrasting Styles

English

1 answer:

raketka [301]2 years ago

6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The first article is from a newspaper of general interest. It was in my father's office. The article refers to the key to success if you want to be a championship team in college sports.

The other article is from a magazine written mainly for professionals in the field of athletics.

The purpose of the first article barely informs the readers of the ways some football coaches have used to build winning teams, despite adversities. The purpose of the second article is more specialized because it refers to a specific football system that has been implemented by some teams that had been successful.

The intended audience of the first article is people in general, such as the common sports fan. It is just an article to capture the interests of the readers. The second is specialized and was written by experts to readers who are coaches or athletic directors.

Regarding the level of technicality, the first article was simple, easy to read. Just for entertainment purposes. The second one was very technical, using sports and football jargon just to be understood by professionals in the field.

You might be interested in

Type the singular possessive form of this noun.

Licemer1 [7]

In order to create the possessive form of a noun you should add 's. If the noun ends in s then you have two options: either you add 's like you do with any other singular noun or you just add an apostrophe ' at the end of the noun.

boy-boy's

soldier-soldier's

lady-lady's

Jones-Jones's OR Jones'

Princess- Princess's OR Princess'

Shepherd- Shepherd's

child- child's

Mr. Dicken- Mr. Dicken's

man- man's

kerry- kerry's

If the noun is in plural and ends in s then you will just add an apostrophe ' at the end. If it is in plural but it doesn't end in s then you should add 's.

kerry-kerries'

wives- wives'

woman- women's

policeman- policemen's

boxes-boxes'

oxen-oxen's

salesman-salesmen's

sopranos-sopranos'

deer-deers'

toys-toys'

empresses-empresses'

5 0

2 years ago

Read the stanza.

Grace [21]

Answer:

He is sold to his employer by is father.

Explanation:

William Blake's poem "The Chimney Sweeper" from his "Songs of Innocence," tells the story of how a small boy was forced into employment as child labor which was a common practice in England of that time. This poem is a generalization of the prominent case of child labor through which some families get their incomes.

Narrated from the small boy's perspective, the first stanza reads

When my mother died I was very young, 

And my father sold me while yet my tongue 

Could scarcely cry " 'weep! 'weep! 'weep! 'weep!" 

So your chimneys I sweep & in soot I sleep

It is clearly evident to see that the young boy's employment came at the death of his mother. His father sold him to be a chimney sweeper even before he could barely talk or speak.

8 0

2 years ago

For which of the following do you need to double the final consonant before adding the suffix?

Vinvika [58]

Among the following words, the choice that you need to double the final consonant before adding the suffix to the base word is, shop + -er. The word shop plus -er becomes shopper with the double consonant p. The rule applied here is that, if the word is only one syllable and ends in a vowel and consonant, double the last letter before the vowel suffix.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I need help please , I tried but I just don't know what's the answer ‍♀️

iren2701 [21]

As far as I remember, a triangle equals 180 degrees. 31+35=66. 180-66=114. 114/38=3. So b=3.

5 0

2 years ago

Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do know that as a youth Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

E). The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.

Explanation:

As per the question, option E displays the assumption 'the Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members' on which the argument lies as it is rightly assumed by logic. This assumption clearly justifies the conclusion 'lesser affluent families receiving a fee reduction' aptly. The other options fail to validate the conclusion as it offers an illogical yet inappropriate claim. Therefore, option E is the correct answer as it reasonably justifies the claim/argument.

5 0

2 years ago