Answer:
$15 per hour
Explanation:
In order for a profit maximizing firm to operate in a competitive market, the marginal revenue product (MRP) must be equal to the marginal cost (MC).
MRP = 1.5 oil changes per hour x $10 per oil change = $15
since MRP = MC, then Linda should pay her worker a maximum of $15 per hour.
No option is even close, they are all over $500 and that is way off limits.
<span> such advertisements make use of consumer differences arising out of micro cultures based on different Sex Roles.
Another example of this would be the advertisements of Guns that is aimed to be appealing to Men because the 'sex roles' as the protector seems to be had by Men</span>
Answer:
B. shortage of 1,000 gallons per week
Explanation:
Price = $1
Quantity demanded = 2,000
Quantity supplied = 1,000
Shortage = Quantity demanded - Quantity supplied
= 2,000 -1,000
= 1,000 gallons per week
Therefore, As per question Quantity demand that is 2,000 and quantity supplied that is 1,000. So, in this given case the Quantity demand is more than the quantity supplied.
Hence, there is shortage of 1,000 gallons per week.
Answer:
Correct options
A.) the $4 in direct costs she would spend to drive to and from her babysitting job:
Emily will have to spend $2 to and $2 on gas for the babysitting job. She will have to consider if she can bear the additional cost compared to the other job opportunity.
B.) the opportunity costs of not working at the store on a Saturday when she babysits:
When Emily is babysitting she has to consider the opportunity cost of working at the retail store. The fact the she will not have to drive to work, instead working at a place close to her home.
Incorrect option
C.) the cost of clothes and personal items (e.g., phone) Emily uses during babysitting:
On both jobs Emily will incur cost of clothing and other personal items, so this is not a cost she should be considering in making a decision between the two jobs.
Answer:
Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Explanation:
What is Partnership
Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.
Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business
Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?
This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.
A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following
1. The partnership has proven indebtedness
2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court
Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
