Answer:
Fact.
Explanation:
A proposition of fact is considered to be a statement in which the focus is primarily to make the audience (e.g arbitrator) believe in it as the truth of false.
In other words, a proposition of fact may deals basically on the existence or non existence, occurrence or non occurrence of something.
Hence, in this case, Since they were focusing on whether something did or did not happen, they were arguing a proposition of FACT.
The inference is that a title of a 1983 hit for eddy grant, and not a property on a classic monopoly board is the electric avenue.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information.
Here, the inference is that a title of a 1983 hit for eddy grant, and not a property on a classic monopoly board is the electric avenue.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
The Indian Removal Act took place in the first half of the 1800s under the presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren and directly led to the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the death of many members of tribes in the American South. It was considered controversial because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tribes' cause wherein the state of Georgia (which was actively seeking to evict the Indian inhabitants) was told it had no right to force their removal. Nevertheless, the president ordered their removal.
hope this helps! :)
Answer:
C. Boats could move more quickly from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great lakes.
Explanation:
Political party, I may be wrong I don't know but it should be correct.
